Terence Bennett - January 2, 2024
Diagram showing first vs third party apis

APIs are everywhere, and as a developer, understanding how to implement them is imperative. The goal of APIs is to make life easier and more efficient — both for the developer and the end-user. The main difference between first-party APIs are created and used within an organization’s own systems, while third-party APIs are developed externally and integrated into other applications for added functionality.

Incorporating APIs into your development workflows requires you to make a number of key decisions, including whether or not to develop in-house or to use external partnerships. Meaning, whether you should develop a first-party API or integrate a third-party API.

Here’s the key lessons to know about first vs. third-party APIs:

  • APIs are essential for developers, allowing applications to exchange data and improve efficiency.
  • First-party APIs are developed internally, offering control, customization, and lifecycle management.
  • Third-party APIs are developed externally and provide ready-made functionalities, saving time and effort.
  • Key differences include ownership/control, data security/privacy, customization/flexibility, reliability/support, and development/maintenance costs.
  • Choosing the right API involves evaluating project requirements, considering control and data sensitivity, assessing pros and cons, and examining real-world scenarios. Comprehensive documentation and support are crucial factors for successful integration.

Table of Contents

There are advantages and disadvantages to both, especially when weighing the pros and cons of customization vs productivity, which is something to consider when you’re aiming to become an API-driven enterprise.

What Is an API?

API stands for Application Programming Interface. APIs allow two applications to exchange data and communicate with one another. For developers, they increase efficiency, automation, personalization, and adaptation — and for the end-user, APIs make it possible to utilize a wide range of services all in one platform.

For example, every time someone uses a mobile application to book a flight, check the weather on their phone, or reserve a table at a restaurant, they’re using an API.

In the eyes of a developer, as Forrester Research analyst Josh Walker explains, building an application without APIs is like “building a house with no doors. The API is how you open the blinds and the doors to exchange information.”

From banking applications to everyday consumer use, APIs impact us all. For developers, they’re particularly important when writing a new program. APIs support developers in that they do not need to start from scratch. Instead, they can contract out key components of their newly written program that have already been created, and most often, to a higher standard. For example, if you want your users to be able to easily schedule appointments, you may want to integrate your app with the Google Calendar API.

There’s no denying that APIs are everywhere, and as a developer, it’s important to understand the key differences between first- and third-party APIs.

What Are First-Party APIs?

First-party APIs are those that are developed internally. These APIs are developed using in-house resources, talent, and systems.

There are clear strengths associated with first-party APIs, including:

  • A first-party APIs gives you complete control over an API’s design, lifecycle, implementation, etc. This is why first-party APIs are so ideal when developing highly unique or security-based applications.
  • The ability to oversee an API’s entire lifecycle often makes an API much more useful and functional over time. At the beginning of an API’s lifecycle, services such as analytics and reporting can be integrated early on, allowing for greater specification. This approach also provides complete control over the deployment and retirement phases of an API. For developers, this benefit is invaluable.

Some of the weaknesses associated with first-party APIs to consider include:

  • Developing an API internally can be both costly and time-consuming, not only in terms of the development phase but also in regard to constant upkeep. This is something to consider based on your current budget and timeline.
  • The possibility of feature creep, which once again, can be costly. This is the tendency for a development project’s requirements to increase during the development phase based on variables that were not originally foreseen.

What Are Third-Party APIs?

As implied, a third-party API is an API that’s developed out-of-house, which is typically much less specialized in comparison to a first-party API. Third-party APIs also include those that are incorporated into a project, such as Google Maps

The strengths associated with third-party APIs, include:

  • As long as you do not require a solution that’s specifically tailored to a client’s unique needs, a third-party API will often be the more efficient, and often safer solution.
  • Your ability to save an immense amount of time. For example, if you’re developing an in-house API and require a maps platform. Why go through the trouble of designing and developing a maps solution when you could just use Google Maps?
  • Access to outside experience, as well as a different point-of-view, is particularly beneficial when aiming to solve a more complex problem.
  • Your ability to focus on building your applications instead of APIs. This is particularly useful during mobile application development.

Learn more about how you can power your tools with the data they need here.

Some of the weaknesses associated with third-party APIs to consider include:

  • If you’re developing an API for a client that requires highly specific needs, a third-party API approach may not be ideal. These APIs will come with specific regulations and requirements which may have a negative impact on your end goal.
  • The fact that the security of your API depends on the thoroughness of someone else. Always be mindful of authentication and authorization.

Key Differences Between First vs. Third-Party APIs

When it comes to integrating APIs into your applications or services, it’s essential to understand the key differences between first-party and third-party APIs. These differences can have significant implications for your development process, data security, customization options, and overall integration experience. Let’s explore the key distinctions between these two types of APIs:

Ownership and Control

  • First-Party APIs: First-party APIs are developed and maintained by the platform or service provider that owns the data or functionality being exposed. As a result, you have direct control and ownership over the API, allowing for greater customization and alignment with your specific requirements.
  • Third-Party APIs: Third-party APIs, on the other hand, are developed by external entities or companies that provide access to their services or functionalities. As a user of a third-party API, you rely on the provider to maintain and update the API, limiting your control and ownership over its development.

Data Security and Privacy Considerations

  • First-Party APIs: Since first-party APIs are developed and controlled by the platform or service provider, there is generally a higher level of trust and assurance regarding data security and privacy. The platform has a vested interest in protecting user data and implementing necessary security measures.
  • Third-Party APIs: With third-party APIs, it’s crucial to assess the provider’s security practices and reputation. While many third-party API providers prioritize data security, there may be instances where you need to evaluate the risks associated with sharing sensitive data with external parties.

Customization and Flexibility

  • First-Party APIs: First-party APIs often offer more extensive customization options, allowing you to tailor the integration to your specific needs. As the platform owner, you have greater control over the functionality and can make changes as necessary.
  • Third-Party APIs: Third-party APIs typically provide predefined functionalities that may not be as customizable. While you can still configure and adapt the API to some extent, the level of customization may be limited based on the provider’s offerings.

Reliability and Support

  • First-Party APIs: First-party APIs tend to offer reliable support, as the platform provider has a vested interest in ensuring their APIs work seamlessly. They often provide extensive documentation, developer resources, and dedicated support channels.
  • Third-Party APIs: The reliability and support for third-party APIs can vary depending on the provider. It’s important to research and choose reputable providers with a track record of reliable API performance and responsive support.

Development and Maintenance Costs

  • First-Party APIs: Since first-party APIs are developed and maintained by the platform owner, there may be lower upfront costs associated with integration. However, keep in mind that ongoing maintenance and updates may still require resources.
  • Third-Party APIs: Third-party APIs can offer cost-effectiveness due to their ready-to-use nature. By leveraging existing functionalities, you can save development time and resources. However, some third-party APIs may have associated usage or licensing fees, depending on the provider’s pricing model.

These key differences between first-party and third-party APIs is crucial for making informed decisions about API integration. By evaluating your specific requirements and considering factors like control, data sensitivity, customization needs

Choosing the Right API for Your Needs

Choosing the right API for your needs requires careful evaluation and consideration. As a developer, it’s essential to align the API selection with your project’s requirements and goals. Here are some key steps to help you make the right choice:

First, thoroughly evaluate your project’s specific requirements and objectives. Understand the functionalities and data access you need from the API to ensure it aligns with your project’s goals.

Consider factors such as control, data sensitivity, and available development resources. If you require more control over the integration and have sensitive data to handle, a first-party API might be the better option. If you’re looking for ready-made functionalities and cost-effectiveness, a third-party API can be a suitable choice.

Assess the pros and cons of each option. Evaluate the advantages and limitations of first-party and third-party APIs in terms of ownership, customization, data security, reliability, and support.

Examine real-world scenarios where each type of API is more suitable. For example, if you’re building an e-commerce platform, leveraging first-party APIs provided by popular payment gateways might offer better control and security. On the other hand, if you need mapping and location services in your application, integrating with a trusted third-party API like Google Maps can save development time and resources.

Lastly, keep in mind that comprehensive documentation, responsive support, and a good track record are crucial factors for successful API integration. Research and choose APIs from providers with reliable support channels and a history of maintaining their APIs effectively.

By following these steps and making informed decisions based on your project’s specific requirements, you can choose the API that best fits your needs and ensures a smooth integration process.

First vs. Third-Party APIs: The Winner?

So, which is better, a first-party API or a third-party API?

The answer to this question is based on an API’s purpose, being rather case-specific.

When deciding to go with a first-party API or a third-party API, you’ll need to consider your current infrastructure, resources, budget, and overall goals. You’re basically comparing an option that provides full control vs a simplified, more automatic out-of-the-box solution, which, of course, restricts control.

A first-party API will always require a lot more time, money, and effort based on its complexity. A cost/benefit analysis will be required if you want to have total control over your product. First-party APIs vs third-party APIs is essentially a comparison of control vs simplicity and productivity.

How Does DreamFactory Assist with Automatic API Generation?

We’ve covered First vs. Third-Party APIs. If you’re looking for both a simple, yet comprehensive solution to REST API automation, generation, and management, DreamFactory offers a wide range of features, including but not limited to:

  • Instant API creation
  • Deep SQL support
  • Server-side scripting
  • Rock-solid security
  • Admin console
  • Application deployment
  • Logging and reporting

Ready to get started? Try your free 14-day DreamFactory trial today!